<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SocialTech &#187; sockpuppet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtech.biz/tag/sockpuppet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtech.biz</link>
	<description>empowering business through the social web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>engagement good faking bad</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtech.biz/blog/engagement-good-faking-bad</link>
		<comments>http://www.socialtech.biz/blog/engagement-good-faking-bad#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sockpuppet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtech.biz/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr Sockpuppet (aka Cllr Grower) has been cleared by the standards board, over the sockpuppet issue. The Standards Board for England found he had not broken the council&#8217;s code of conduct as he was not acting for the authority when posting the messages. The board noted: &#8220;The code of conduct applies to members when they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Sockpuppet (aka Cllr Grower) has been cleared by the standards board, over the sockpuppet issue.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Standards Board for England found he had not broken the council&#8217;s code of conduct as he was not acting for the authority when posting the messages.</p>
<p>The board noted: &#8220;The code of conduct applies to members when they conduct the business of their authority.</p>
<p>&#8220;In writing under another name for a newspaper Councillor Ben Grower was not conducting the business of his authority or office.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>How is commenting on council projects, by a councillor on a public forum&#8230; such as the echo website NOT conducting the business of his authority or office?</p>
<p>Is that to say he could leave racist, or other hate speech online under a pseudonym and that would be ok? Surely not.</p>
<p>Irrespective of the findings, he is a fool. If you are any kind of public figure and you engage with the public in any means you should be accountable for that.</p>
<p>It almost makes me want to write to the councillor and offer him some free training.</p>
<p>Engagement online, 2 points &#8211; faking it -10 points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.socialtech.biz/blog/engagement-good-faking-bad/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
